The Best Choice In Property Agent 2013 Awarded by Indonesian Government
New Products
Tampilkan postingan dengan label big data. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label big data. Tampilkan semua postingan

Minggu, 26 Januari 2014

Big Data Saves Lives

A map of New York City that displays the number of serious fire incidents.

from Greg
Big data is a common buzz word in tech. It simple means using fast computers to analyze HUGE databases to make predictions on future events. This week at the Big Data Innovation Summit in Las Vegas there was a presentation on how big data is helping big cities predict where fires will most likely breakout in the future. As more data becomes available we could see all sorts of innovation in predicting crime and disaster relief. Big data saves lives.


from The Verge

New York City is using big data to predict fires

There are certain factors that make buildings in New York City more likely to have a fire, including average neighborhood income, the age of the building, and whether it has electrical issues. The city's Fire Department has now cataloged 60 of these factors in a database that ranks buildings in order of their risk of fire, using the results to decide which ones get inspected first.

The new method aligns with a national trend toward using big data to make city services more efficient. Boston uses a similar system to identify which properties should get visits from the police, for example.

In the past, New York's firefighters made sure to hit high-priority buildings like schools and libraries more frequently. But other than that, inspections were almost random. The new system should reduce the number of fires and make fires less severe, according to the fire department.

----------

from The Wall Street Journal

New York City has about a million buildings, and each year 3,000 of them erupt in a major fire. Can officials predict which ones will go up in flames?

The New York City Fire Department thinks it can use data mining to do that. Analysts at the department say that some buildings are linked to characteristics that make them more likely to have a fire than others.

Poverty, for one.

Low-income neighborhoods are correlated with fires,” said Jeff Chen, the department’s Director of Analytics, at an industry conference in Las Vegas.

Other factors that correlate with deadly fires: the age of the building, whether it has electrical issues, the number and location of sprinklers and the presence of elevators. Buildings that are vacant or unguarded are twice as likely to have a fire, Chen says.

All this may sound obvious. But it is hard to absorb all the relevant factors at once.

So New York officials have taken roughly 60 different factors and built an algorithm that assigns each one of the city’s 330,000 inspectable buildings with a risk score (The Fire Department doesn’t inspect single and two-family homes).

When fire officers go on weekly inspections, the computer spits out a sheet with a list of buildings, ranked by their risk score, that they should visit first.

The data-mining program went into effect in July and will be expanded to 2400 categories in the coming months. Inspections before it was adopted were fairly random, Chen says.

Buildings considered to be safety priorities, like schools and libraries, were supposed to be inspected more frequently. But the city didn’t target specific buildings based on their risk.

What’s happening in New York City–which became more data-driven under former Mayor Michael Bloomberg–is an example of how many municipalities are trying to to use the data they routinely collect to improve services.

Boston uses big data in its Problem Properties program, which exploits information from different city sources–such as complaint calls, safety records, crimes and tax collections–to identify which properties should get visits by police.

While making investments in big data systems seems like common sense, cities have trouble measuring their success. Officials may be able to cite statistics showing the number of fires or crimes dropping, but demonstrating that big data tools were the reason may be difficult because it involves proving a negative–that something didn’t happen because of their efforts.

“Ultimately, we should see the number of fires go down,” says Jeff Roth, the Fire Department’s Assistant Commissioner for Management Initiatives. “And fires should become less severe.”

Add to Cart View detail

Senin, 29 April 2013

Challenges with Threat Intelligence, Attribution, and Active Defense are on the Agenda at Suits and Spooks La Jolla

We've got a tremendous speaker line-up including John Caruthers, the head of the FBI's National Security Cyber Program at the San Diego field office, while on intelligence matters, we have RADM Andy Singer (USN ret) who, among his many accomplishments, was the Director of Intelligence for PACCOM. Lance Cottrell, the founder of Anonymizer, will speak on Operational Anonymity & Misattribution: Why you need it, how they track you, how to do it, how it fails, and best practices.

Additional topics and panels include:
  • Projecting Geopolitically Relevant Cyber Hot-Spots by Ali-Reza Anghaie
  • Threat Intelligence for the Enterprise on a Shoestring Budget by Shane MacDougall
  • The State of National Cyber Intelligence by Troy Townsend and Jay McAllister
  • HUMINT Factor: How HUMINT Influences Attribution of Threat Actors and Whether or Not It’s Necessary
  • Can Data Analytics and Incident Response Scale Down? by Stephen Cobb
  • Is there a place on Special Operations teams for Cyber Warriors? (Panel moderator Jim Butterworth; Speakers – Thomas Dzieran, Rob DuBois, RADM Andy Singer (USN ret))
  • The importance of international collaboration in identifying and interdicting non-state hacker groups (Panel moderator Christopher Burgess; Speakers – John Caruthers, Kenneth Geers, Michael Jaeger)
  • Advanced Technologies for Detecting the Insider Threat by John Sipple
  • Vulnerability Disclosure and ‘Cyberwar’: The Cost of Offensive Cyber Weapons by Ryan Ellis
  • Kenneth Geers: Technical expert for the “Tallinn Manual on the International Law applicable to Cyber Warfare” will speak and take questions on this very important document.
This two day conference (Saturday, June 15 and Sunday, June 16) will be held at the San Diego Marriott La Jolla hotel and consist of a combination of plenary and break-out sessions. A continental breakfast and lunch will be served on both days. Attendance will be limited to no more than 100 people to allow attendees to interact more closely with our speakers during the event.

The following Early Bird rates apply through May 10, 2013.
  • Early Bird $395
  • Securing our eCity Foundation member or affiliate $345
  • Government/Military/Academia rate $295
Register via PayPal or by telephone (1-855-777-8242)

After May 10, our discounted rates will revert to the standard $595.



Rates
Add to Cart View detail

Most View Product

Contact Online

Support : Copyright © 2011. Demo Template AGC - All Rights Reserved
Template Clone Script ID