The Best Choice In Property Agent 2013 Awarded by Indonesian Government
New Products
Tampilkan postingan dengan label New York. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label New York. Tampilkan semua postingan

Minggu, 26 Januari 2014

Big Data Saves Lives

A map of New York City that displays the number of serious fire incidents.

from Greg
Big data is a common buzz word in tech. It simple means using fast computers to analyze HUGE databases to make predictions on future events. This week at the Big Data Innovation Summit in Las Vegas there was a presentation on how big data is helping big cities predict where fires will most likely breakout in the future. As more data becomes available we could see all sorts of innovation in predicting crime and disaster relief. Big data saves lives.


from The Verge

New York City is using big data to predict fires

There are certain factors that make buildings in New York City more likely to have a fire, including average neighborhood income, the age of the building, and whether it has electrical issues. The city's Fire Department has now cataloged 60 of these factors in a database that ranks buildings in order of their risk of fire, using the results to decide which ones get inspected first.

The new method aligns with a national trend toward using big data to make city services more efficient. Boston uses a similar system to identify which properties should get visits from the police, for example.

In the past, New York's firefighters made sure to hit high-priority buildings like schools and libraries more frequently. But other than that, inspections were almost random. The new system should reduce the number of fires and make fires less severe, according to the fire department.

----------

from The Wall Street Journal

New York City has about a million buildings, and each year 3,000 of them erupt in a major fire. Can officials predict which ones will go up in flames?

The New York City Fire Department thinks it can use data mining to do that. Analysts at the department say that some buildings are linked to characteristics that make them more likely to have a fire than others.

Poverty, for one.

Low-income neighborhoods are correlated with fires,” said Jeff Chen, the department’s Director of Analytics, at an industry conference in Las Vegas.

Other factors that correlate with deadly fires: the age of the building, whether it has electrical issues, the number and location of sprinklers and the presence of elevators. Buildings that are vacant or unguarded are twice as likely to have a fire, Chen says.

All this may sound obvious. But it is hard to absorb all the relevant factors at once.

So New York officials have taken roughly 60 different factors and built an algorithm that assigns each one of the city’s 330,000 inspectable buildings with a risk score (The Fire Department doesn’t inspect single and two-family homes).

When fire officers go on weekly inspections, the computer spits out a sheet with a list of buildings, ranked by their risk score, that they should visit first.

The data-mining program went into effect in July and will be expanded to 2400 categories in the coming months. Inspections before it was adopted were fairly random, Chen says.

Buildings considered to be safety priorities, like schools and libraries, were supposed to be inspected more frequently. But the city didn’t target specific buildings based on their risk.

What’s happening in New York City–which became more data-driven under former Mayor Michael Bloomberg–is an example of how many municipalities are trying to to use the data they routinely collect to improve services.

Boston uses big data in its Problem Properties program, which exploits information from different city sources–such as complaint calls, safety records, crimes and tax collections–to identify which properties should get visits by police.

While making investments in big data systems seems like common sense, cities have trouble measuring their success. Officials may be able to cite statistics showing the number of fires or crimes dropping, but demonstrating that big data tools were the reason may be difficult because it involves proving a negative–that something didn’t happen because of their efforts.

“Ultimately, we should see the number of fires go down,” says Jeff Roth, the Fire Department’s Assistant Commissioner for Management Initiatives. “And fires should become less severe.”

Add to Cart View detail

Jumat, 10 Januari 2014

T Mobile Wants Biz


From Greg
Business Insider ran a story about the great deals T Mobile is offering to get new customers. If you switch to T-Mobile from Verizon, AT&T, or Sprint, T-Mobile will now pay the early termination fee  up to $350 per line. 

T-Mobile's plans are cheaper. You can pay $65 per month for 2.5 GB of data and unlimited calling/texting. Unlike Verizon, T-Mobile doesn't charge you extra if you go over your data allotment. Instead, it slows your data down a bit until the next billing cycle starts. Get a new iPhone 5S, pay $25 per month.




Read the full story at Business Insider HERE

by Steve Kovach

Next to cable providers and airlines, wireless carriers are probably the most hated service that we pretty much have no choice but to pay for.

About a year and a half ago, I switched to Verizon from AT&T because I had a lot of problems making calls that didn't drop. (Yes, I still talk on the phone a lot. My family lives thousands of miles away in Texas and it's still the best way for me to keep up with them.)

I've been mostly happy with Verizon. The data speeds are fast. I don't think I've ever had a dropped call. And I'm covered just about anywhere I travel.

But boy is it expensive. I pay $110 per month for 2 GB of data and unlimited calling/texting.

Yesterday, T-Mobile made an offer I can't refuse.

If you switch to T-Mobile from Verizon, AT&T, or Sprint, T-Mobile will now pay the early termination fee (ETF) carriers charge you to cancel your contract, up to $350 per line. You're also required to trade in your old smartphone, which T-Mobile will pay you for so you can buy a new one. That means there's no risk for me to abandon my contract from Verizon. T-Mobile will foot the bill.

And T-Mobile's plans are cheaper. I can pay $65 per month for 2.5 GB of data and unlimited calling/texting. Unlike Verizon, T-Mobile doesn't charge you extra if you go over your data allotment. Instead, it slows your data down a bit until the next billing cycle starts. Assuming I get a new iPhone 5S, I'll also be paying $25 per month for my phone. (T-Mobile sells you an iPhone 5S for $0 down plus $25 per month for 24 months. You also have the option to pay off the phone in full right away if you'd like.)

So if I switch now, I'll only be paying $90 per month, $20 less than I do now. Plus I'll be getting 500 MB more data per month, and I won't have to worry about getting slapped with the occasional $10 fee Verizon sometimes charges me if I happen to go over my data plan. I'd rather have slightly slower data for a few days than pay that fee.

Then there's the question of devices. I have an iPhone 5 now, and I've been holding out for the iPhone 6 (or whatever Apple ends up calling it) that should launch this fall. If I switch to an iPhone 5S now, then I'd still theoretically be paying it off in the fall and won't be able to get the new model.

But T-Mobile has a fix for that. It lets you pay off your phone whenever you want and switch to a new device on the payment plan. So when the next iPhone comes out, I'll pay off my 5S, sell it on Craigslist (iPhones hold their value really well), and get the new iPhone on T-Mobile's monthly payment plan. Not bad. And I'm still saving money in the long run.

My biggest concern is coverage. T-Mobile's 4G LTE network (the fastest wireless standard available today) is still tiny compared to what AT&T and Verizon can offer. Luckily, from what I understand, T-Mobile's LTE is pretty good in New York where I live. In fact, my former colleague Dan Frommer says it's better and more reliable than Verizon. That's pretty appealing.

My other concern has nothing to do with T-Mobile. I imagine when I tell Verizon I want to cancel my contract they won't make it easy on me. And I'm pretty sure it's going to take some time to get my ETF refund from T-Mobile. These kinds of things can't happen overnight.

But in the long run, I'm going to be saving money every month on my wireless bill. And that's worth a little bit of hassle.


Add to Cart View detail

Senin, 10 Juni 2013

Identifying Aggressors in the Global Cyber Threatscape

Independent hacker groups and cyber militias who conduct network attacks complicate international relations between governments. President Obama, at the conclusion of his historic talks with President Xi Jingping last Friday, acknowledged that the "theft of business, financial and military information ... are not issues that are unique to the U.S.-China relationship. Those are issues that are of international concern. Oftentimes it’s nonstate actors who are engaging in these issues as well.

No nation state can be held responsible for all of the attacks emanating from their own IP addresses. Attribution remains a hard challenge, and the potential for serious miscalculations and misjudgments is high.

Since the landscape is foggy, the threat actors numerous and hard to identify, and the attacks proliferating on a daily basis, the focus of the next Suits and Spooks conference will be to identify non-state aggressors in cyberspace. About twenty speakers will present briefings over two days on hackers, citizen militias, and other non-state entities operating in the Middle East, China, Russia, Pakistan, India, Iran, Africa, South America, the United States (yes - we have non-gov threat actors domestically), and other parts of the world.

A partial list of our country experts include:
  • Peter Matthis (Editor, Jamestown Foundation China Brief): China
  • Peiran Wang (Ph.D. candidate, The Center for Economic Law and Governance, Faculty of Law and Criminology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel): China
  • John Scott-Railton (Research Fellow at Citizen Lab, University of Toronto): Syria, Libya
  • A. Aaron Weisburd (Instructor, Combating Terrorism Center at West Point; Founder, Internet Haganah): Middle East
  • Sheena Chestnut Greitens, Ph.D. (Fellow, Harvard's Fairbank Center for Chinese Studies): North Korea
  • Jonathan Hutson (Communications Director - Satellite Sentinel Project and The Enough Project): Africa
The venue will be in New York City at SOHO House on October 5-6, 2013. Admission will be limited to no more than 80 people so register early. Lunch will be provided on both days. If you'd like to submit a proposal for a talk, please do so by July 15, 2013.

Companies interested in sponsorship options for this event can view our prospectus on Google Drive.
The SOHO House NY Library

Registration

Super Early Bird: (June 10 - July 10): $275
Early Bird (July 11 - Aug 31): $395
Standard (Sep 1 until sold out): $625


Select One
Add to Cart View detail

Most View Product

Contact Online

Support : Copyright © 2011. Demo Template AGC - All Rights Reserved
Template Clone Script ID